Sunday, May 27, 2007

The history not forgotten

China has always been a country with a sense of mystery, covered by its own glory past as the easter empire, the troubled 19th and 20th century tangled between civil war and foreign invasions, and now more importantly an emerging power of the 21st century. There are certainly a lot of interests in china, and the British media certainly has chosen China as one of their favourite subject.

Channel four has a correspondeant in China who obviouslly loves to report all the dark corners of the society which looks to be poised for fastest economy growth ever. While they are dragging on the human rights issues, Channel five has taken a more historical view on things that have shaped China over the past century and also try to find the links between the past and today. Variety is always a positive thing, for viewers you get a more fully rounded picture and you can make your own judgement based on the input from various angels.

There has been a series of programmes on Channel five covering the red army's long march, the cultural revolution and also the Paul Merton in China - which is showing the life in today's China. I was impressed by the very objective and neutural view from the commentators in these programmes, it shows a good sense of maturity, understanding and putting things into the perspective and circumstances in which the events occured.

In the programmes about cultural revoluation, it shows the historical moment when Nixon was visiting Beijing and his meeting with Mao, whose health at the time was deteriorting. But both looked exicted about the occasion, and then Nixon was taken to the entertainment in the evening, where they were watching the red guards (in their very distinctive uniform) dancing and chanting the long live Mao songs. I can imagine he must have been feeling a bit disturbed watching a performance like that, not really the sort of entertainment he expected, but nevertheless he had to look interested. And then it was when Henry Kissinger was visiting Beijing, Mao was obviously amused when he saw Kissinger's very tall wife (who was probably a former volleyball player!). He was a whimsical man, who had a side of artist.

I was only very little when the gang of four was sentensed (the trial was broadcasted throughout China). But I certainly remember the atmosphere in the room where the crowd was watching TV. It was a momemnt never to be forgotten for a lot of Chinese. But how much do the new generation know about this history and its impact on China, probably very little. I guess sometimes the baggage from the past could be too heavy to carry along the way, and maybe it is too much to ask the young people today to make a connection with a past they never experienced.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Jenny,

Couple of comments:

There will be lots of interest in China between now and 2008. And a certain amount of growing trepidation as well.

Mao whimsical ? He was a mass murderer first and foremost who ruled through fear.

Chinese history will in time re-write the Mao era for the balanced portrayal that you wish for.

In the meantime young people in China grow up being fed censored history. When the young generation can read Wild Swans and Jung Chang's book on the life of Mao - then they will be iformed and then they can make a connection to history.

Anonymous said...

Well, I think cultural revolution has more or less been rewritten in the Deng's time, so in a way I am not convinced that one person's novel could paint a more accurate picture than the generation like my parents who have had real life experience - the stupidity of big leaps and sending students to the countryside for "reeducation". Sometimes I think westerners tend to think they always know more (truth) than the people actually lived through that part of history, which I think it is a pitiful mistake. Seeing is believing! Reading a book which is to a lot of extent written to suit commercial interest of publishers, I have a lot of doubts of his true reflection of history and I certaily wouldn't advise my children to read it, instead my parents can tell them more about what they have been through as educated young people.

A lot of books about Mao has been focused on his personal life, which largely ignore the people who suffered from his dictatorship. Who cares that much about his personal life!! It is all there for more gossip than real substance!

And that was a joke when the commentator on that programme said he was whimsical! You have to appreciate his sense of humor! I did anyway!

Anonymous said...

Strange for the author of the original blog to then write an anonymous comment !!!

:):)